Publication:
Australia’s contribution to achieving global food security: to what extent can reform of the federal research and development tax incentives assist?

dc.contributor.advisor McKerchar, Margaret en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Stoianoff, Natalie en_US
dc.contributor.author Roberts, Victoria en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-15T11:00:16Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-15T11:00:16Z
dc.date.issued 2015 en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis proposes a legislative model Research and Development Tax Incentive (RDTI) for Australia to stimulate greater private investment in agricultural research and development (R&D), thereby increasing Australia’s contribution to global food security. A review of the food security literature demonstrates that underinvestment in agricultural R&D is diminishing the world’s capacity to sustainably provide food security for all. The international literature on tax policy and reform, whilst generally silent on the specific challenge of food security, does confirm the positive role that taxation measures can potentially play in assisting with contemporary social challenges. Guided by pragmatism, this socio-legal reform orientated thesis undertakes comparative case studies of RDTIs from Japan, South Africa and the United States to elicit their strengths and weaknesses and identify best practice. These findings, together with a critical analysis of the existing Australian RDTI law, are drawn together in developing the proposed legislative model. The merit of the model is also considered in terms of the widely accepted criteria of a good tax system, namely certainty and administrative efficiency (including simplicity and compliance costs), in conjunction with the potential to contribute to global food security. In an attempt to integrate taxation and innovation with other economic objectives, the model RDTI legislatively incorporates national strategic research priorities to produce a more cohesive approach to R&D reform. This approach is designed to direct finite government funding towards targeted areas of national concern. It is envisioned that the model Australian RDTI could be adopted by other tax jurisdictions, or alternatively, adapted to encourage innovative approaches to other social challenges (domestic or global) in a relatively flexible and timely manner. The thesis demonstrates both the potential and merit for innovative tailoring of tax provisions which embrace benevolent aspirations alongside national economic objectives. The model RDTI is an example of how well-drafted legislation underpinned by clear policy intent can drive meaningful and strategic tax reform for the betterment of society as a whole. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/54455
dc.language English
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.publisher UNSW, Sydney en_US
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 en_US
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ en_US
dc.subject.other Global food security en_US
dc.subject.other R&D en_US
dc.subject.other Research and Development Tax Incentive en_US
dc.subject.other Agriculture en_US
dc.subject.other Tax policy en_US
dc.subject.other Innovation en_US
dc.subject.other R&D tax incentive en_US
dc.subject.other Pragmatism en_US
dc.subject.other Sustainability en_US
dc.subject.other Japan en_US
dc.subject.other South Africa en_US
dc.subject.other United States en_US
dc.subject.other Australia en_US
dc.subject.other Comparative tax research en_US
dc.subject.other Socio-legal en_US
dc.subject.other Tax reform en_US
dc.subject.other Global social challenge en_US
dc.title Australia’s contribution to achieving global food security: to what extent can reform of the federal research and development tax incentives assist? en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dcterms.accessRights open access
dcterms.rightsHolder Roberts, Victoria
dspace.entity.type Publication en_US
unsw.accessRights.uri https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
unsw.date.embargo 2017-03-31 en_US
unsw.description.embargoNote Embargoed until 2017-03-31
unsw.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/2754
unsw.relation.faculty Business
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Roberts, Victoria, Taxation and Business Law, Australian School of Business, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation McKerchar, Margaret, Taxation and Business Law, Australian School of Business, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Stoianoff, Natalie, University of Technology, Sydney en_US
unsw.relation.school School of Taxation & Business Law *
unsw.thesis.degreetype PhD Doctorate en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
public version.pdf
Size:
3.31 MB
Format:
application/pdf
Description:
Resource type