Publication:
Assessing climate data for studies of climate change impacts: A case study of wheat cropping in New South Wales

dc.contributor.advisor Pitman, Andy en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Penny, Whetton en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Gab, Abramowitz en_US
dc.contributor.author Macadam, Ian en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-22T09:21:46Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-22T09:21:46Z
dc.date.issued 2015 en_US
dc.description.abstract Wheat yields for New South Wales, Australia simulated by the APSIM agricultural model are used as a case study to investigate how the suitability of climate datasets for input into complex impact models can be assessed. Climate forcing datasets for APSIM are generated from the output of multiple climate models using three different types of method using unprocessed climate output, statistically correcting climate model output and perturbing observations of the recent climate with simulated future climate changes. The application of multiple processing methods to multiple climate model simulations generates a range of different climate datasets. Simulated impact changes are sensitive to differences in future changes in the climate between these datasets. In addition, simulated impact changes can be sensitive to differences in the representation of the recent climate. These arise because different climate models have different errors in their simulations of the real climate and different processing methods correct these to different extents. The thesis takes an impact-based approach to assessing different climate datasets. It compares wheat yields for a recent time period from APSIM simulations forced with datasets derived from climate models with yields from APSIM simulations forced with climate observations and addresses the question: To what extent can impact-based assessment be used to evaluate climate forcing datasets for a complex crop model? While the impact-based approach reveals those combinations of climate models and processing methods that result in large errors in simulated recent yields, there is no strong overall relationship between errors in simulated recent yields and future changes in yields. The approach is therefore not useful in determining which climate models and processing methods give the most plausible simulated future changes in yields. This thesis therefore concludes that, to sample uncertainty, impact studies should ideally apply multiple processing methods to many climate models. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/54322
dc.language English
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.publisher UNSW, Sydney en_US
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 en_US
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ en_US
dc.subject.other agricultural model en_US
dc.subject.other climate model en_US
dc.subject.other model evaluation en_US
dc.subject.other climate change en_US
dc.subject.other downscaling en_US
dc.subject.other bias correction en_US
dc.subject.other wheat en_US
dc.subject.other New South Wales en_US
dc.subject.other Australia en_US
dc.subject.other APSIM en_US
dc.title Assessing climate data for studies of climate change impacts: A case study of wheat cropping in New South Wales en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dcterms.accessRights open access
dcterms.rightsHolder Macadam, Ian
dspace.entity.type Publication en_US
unsw.accessRights.uri https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
unsw.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/18146
unsw.relation.faculty Science
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Macadam, Ian, Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC), Faculty of Science, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Pitman, Andy, Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC), Faculty of Science, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Penny, Whetton, CSIRO en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Gab, Abramowitz, Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC), Faculty of Science, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.school School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences *
unsw.thesis.degreetype PhD Doctorate en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
public version.pdf
Size:
10.45 MB
Format:
application/pdf
Description:
Resource type