skip to main content

James Braid: Surgeon, Gentleman Scientist, and Hypnotist

Yeates, Lindsay Bertram, History & Philosophy, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW


Check for online availability

  • Title:
    James Braid: Surgeon, Gentleman Scientist, and Hypnotist
  • Author/Creator/Curator: Yeates, Lindsay Bertram, History & Philosophy, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW
  • Subjects: M'Neile, Hugh Boyd (1795-1879); Braid, James (1795-1860); Lafontaine, Charles (1803-1892); Hypnotism; Hypnotism - History; Hypnotism –Therapeutic Use; Boundary Work; Hypnotic Suggestion; Suggestive Therapeutics; Talipes, clubfoot; Surgery - History; Medicine - History; Psychology - History; Mental Suggestion; British Association for the Advancement of Science; Mesmerism - History; Animal Magnetism - HIstory; Phreno-Mesmerism; Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh; Hypnosis
  • Resource type: Thesis
  • Type of thesis: Ph.D.
  • Date: 2013
  • Supervisor: Corones, Anthony, History & Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW; Cam, Philip, Philosophy, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW
  • Language: English
  • Print availability: T/2013/37 (Please speak to a staff member at the Library Help Zone)
  • Permissions: This work can be used in accordance with the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND license.
    Please see additional information at

  • Description: This dissertation examines the critical period and the circumstances that led Scottish surgeon James Braid (1795-1860) to produce his classic work on hypnotism, NEURYPNOLOGY (1843). The full story of these fateful events, from his first encounter with the Swiss magnetic demonstrator, Charles Lafontaine in November 1841, to his conversazione at the time of the British Association for the Advancement of ScienceÂ’s Manchester meeting in June 1842, is told here for the first time. It is based on the accumulated evidence within BraidÂ’s own publications (his contributions to journals and magazines, letters, press releases, advertisements, pamphlets, and books), and a wide range of the contemporaneous literature (the majority of which has, to date, remained unknown, unidentified and unexamined) including accurate, stenographic transcriptions of BraidÂ’s public lectures, eyewitness reports of his technical demonstrations and experiments. These sources record James BraidÂ’s incremental development of his hypnotic theories and practices, how these practices were an extension of his surgical knowledge, how he dealt with positive and negative ‘feed-backÂ’, how he learned from his own observations and experience, and how he performed his boundary work, defending his enterprise from the territorial claims of medical, religious, philosophical, metaphysical, mesmeric, and magnetic rivals. An extended and ‘in depthÂ’ narrative of these events is essential to a correct representation of the nature and character of NEURYPNOLOGY, and the history of hypnotism since its publication. By delivering such a narrative, the dissertation not only contributes to the rectification of the distortions (and the filling of substantial gaps) in the historical record on Braid, it also identifies and clarifies a number of misrepresentations. The consequent exhumation of a more authentic version of BraidÂ’s hypnotic practice and treatment rationale, further, holds some hope for improvement in modern practice, given the confusions that have persisted since BraidÂ’s time. This dissertation concludes that without the innovative, persistent, and surgically trained Braid, the practice of hypnotism as a complex of incremental strategic interventions may not have come into being.

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait