Publication:
Essays in Empirical Finance

dc.contributor.author Siaw, Kok Keng en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-15T11:30:47Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-15T11:30:47Z
dc.date.issued 2017 en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis consists of three stand-alone essays in the funds management literature. The first essay examines the rationales for investing in closed-end funds (CEFs). Recent theory argues CEF serves as an ideal investment vehicle for investors who seek to gain exposure to illiquid securities and yet wish to avoid the high cost of transactions attached to such securities. Consistent with the predictions, this study finds CEF investors tend to avoid costly securities that the CEFs have already invested into. Further tests show that investors with short-term investment horizon and investors with preferences towards small-cap value securities are driving the results. More importantly, these results can be generalizable to the U.K., suggesting that they are applicable to other markets with significant CEF industries. The second essay looks at the performance of hedge fund option strategies. This study utilizes a large sample of hedge fund managers' option holdings directly from their Form 13F filings for the period between 1999 and 2012. A direct construction of a hypothetical tracking portfolio that mimics these hedge fund option strategies yields significant negative monthly returns. These results survive a series of robustness tests such as alternative performance evaluation methodologies, different assumptions on option characteristics, and subsample analyses. Furthermore, there is no performance differential between option strategies implemented by hedge funds and by other institutional managers, who are often deemed to be less sophisticated. Taken together, this study does not support the view that hedge fund managers are skillful in executing informed trades in the options market. The third essay investigates the value of institutional brokerage relationship in the mutual fund industry. Specifically, this study exploits the recent collapse of Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008 as a natural experimental setting to examine the performance of Lehman mutual fund clients subsequent to the collapse. This study finds Lehman clients with concentrated brokerage networks and those with specialization in small-cap securities are adversely affected. Using a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach, these client funds experience significant drop in risk-adjusted returns. Collectively, our results support the view that information and research services from the sell-side industry are indispensable inputs in enhancing mutual fund performance. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/57361
dc.language English
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.publisher UNSW, Sydney en_US
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 en_US
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ en_US
dc.title Essays in Empirical Finance en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dcterms.accessRights open access
dcterms.rightsHolder Siaw, Kok Keng
dspace.entity.type Publication en_US
unsw.accessRights.uri https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
unsw.date.embargo 2019-03-31 en_US
unsw.description.embargoNote Embargoed until 2019-03-31
unsw.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/3135
unsw.relation.faculty Business
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Siaw, Kok Keng, Banking & Finance, Australian School of Business, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.school School of Banking & Finance *
unsw.thesis.degreetype PhD Doctorate en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
public version.pdf
Size:
2.1 MB
Format:
application/pdf
Description:
Resource type