Abstract
Flood evacuation models can provide an effective mechanism to analyse flood risks and
evacuation response actions. In this study, practical applications of evacuation
simulation models are presented to help examine flood-related evacuation scenarios.
Simulation frameworks are demonstrated through the case studies of Brisbane City,
Queensland, Australia, which has a long history of floods and has experienced major
flooding events in 2011 and 2013. These case studies were investigated to demonstrate
feasible applications of flood extent prediction, network bottleneck estimation, evacuees’
behaviour and shelter demand, which contribute to flood risk mitigation and evacuation
planning. The proposed flood evacuation models are proven to help increase community
resilience in at-risk areas in Brisbane.
Effective flood emergency management needs an integrated operation of interacting
with human and technological systems. In this study, firstly, spatial toolkits are
employed to analyse the shelter assignment and routing strategies based on network
calculations. Simulation results indicate that the nearest shelters and routing directions
can be determined based on the unique location of each household. To analyse the
temporal flood risks and identify dangerous areas, an inundation model is proposed to
provide flooding information for a dynamic risk analysis study. Test results of the
inundation model show that it is able to predict the flood inundation extent at an
accuracy of 66.9% which is higher than or comparable with the existing studies.
A large-scale inundation can affect the endangered areas progressively and the temporal
aspect of the incident should be captured in evacuation planning. By integrating the
simulated flood dynamics, a city-scale microscopic evacuation model is built through an
agent-based approach; different flood stages associated with departure times and various
behaviour rules are tested for the Brisbane evacuation scenarios. The inclusion of flood
dynamics in the evacuation model is essential for identifying temporally critical locations in the network as it provides a perspective to observe the dynamic interactions
between evacuees and floodwater. In the agent-based flood evacuation scenarios, more
than 12,000 evacuees are simulated and less than 7% of evacuees were still moving
towards shelters after 120 minutes since the evacuation started. Evacuees are more
evenly distributed in the pre-determined six shelters when more complex behaviour
such as evacuee density detection is considered. A static traffic assignment approach is
also implemented towards simulating the urban evacuation scenarios. The results of the
traffic assignment approach show a much less network clearance time compared to the
agent-based approach, which reveals the difference between these two models in terms
of input, modelling algorithms and output. Suggestions are provided for the choice of
modelling tools based on this comparison analysis.
Overall, the flood evacuation model enables explicit interactions among evacuees and
between human response and floods to be captured as the flood incident evolves. It can
be easily adapted to simulate a wide range of flood scenarios. Case studies of Brisbane
have demonstrated the model’s capability to examine flood risks and support for flood
evacuation planning.